According to these authors, Death penalty comes last in the list of possible ways of deterring crime. Long life sentence, as a matter of fact, is a better method of controlling and deterring crime compared to death penalty.
Death penalty is usually applied arbitrarily and is most of the times irrevocable. This means that application of death pealty denies the due process of law Bedau 4. Victims once convicted are denied the right to benefit from new evidence that may come up after conviction. Life in parole sentences are advocated for by many who are against death penalty as victims may have a chance of being acquitted once new evidence comes up. In the United States and other heterogeneous societies, the public and civil societies always feel that death penalty is violates the constitutional right of equality and protection.
Available statistical data from different states in the United States prove that death sentence is never applied fairly. There are more blacks who have been executed compared to other races Frederick This does not necessarily mean that blacks are involved more in crime compared to their white or colored counterparts.
Instead of people arguing every now and then that Race is not the only factor that determines whether a suspect criminal ends being convicted to die or not. Other factors like education status and social status have been quoted as other basis used to disproportionately apply death penalty Those who advocate for death penalty argue that death penalty has far reaching economic benefits compared to other forms of sentencing like life without parole.
They argue that maintaining a life sentence criminal costs nations lots of resources compared to death penalty. This, nevertheless, is not necessary true. Capital punishment squanders and energy of the whole justice system. Prolonged court session before one can be convicted waste resources that could otherwise be used to compensate families of victims. As it has already been noted, some suspects get executed on the basis of social status.
The numbers of poor people who have been executed in all American states exceed the nuumber of rich suspects who have had the same fate. Poor people may not have enough fees to hire attorneys who can put up a strong defense in court. Innocent people have thus ended up being executed a simply because they could not hire attorney who could represent them well. The issue of poverty notwithstanding, suspects may get convicted to die simply because an error was made by a judge who is all human and bound to make mistakes.
All worlds' religions including certain cults teach against killing. Christians, for example, state that God is the sole provider of life and no human being has the power or authority to take human life.
Other religious hold a similar stand. If almost everyone living on this planet is taught about sanctity of life, why should a state organ, like the judiciary, come in and do something contrary to these teachings. Arguments against death sentence are solid. Any person looking at these arguments rationally will be convinced that death sentence should be abolished by those who still practice it. We are in the 21 st century and so barbaric executions like those of days of slave should be done away with.
Death penalty fails to respect sanctity of life and should thus be seen as an unfeeling, immoral and inhumane act. Innocent people have ended up being victims of errors made by justice systems. All these reasons form a formidable force that should push any stubborn nation, institution or individual to admit that it is a high time that death penalty was abolished. One of the most famous cases of the murder of an innocent man was execution of Timothy Evans in He was tried and executed for the murder of his baby daughter Geraldine.
Thus, taking the life of innocent people, we become murderers. On the other hand, the death penalty is the only just punishment for many of the relatives and friends of the victims.
It is difficult to live, when you know that the man who killed your loved one is still breathing. Furthermore, the most common and reasonable argument is that the death penalty is an effective deterrent. The fear of death affects everybody, and criminals are no exception. If they understand that after the serious crime they must bear such punishment, they should think twice before they commit to it.
This argument is supported by statistics which reveal that the crime rate in countries where in this form of punishment still exists is far less as compared to those countries wherein it has been abolished. In conclusion, there are many of pros and cons of the death penalty, but there is no single solution.
Because the issues concerning life and death are always the most difficult. In my opinion, the death penalty is absolutely contrary to moral principles and it is not able to bring us closer to justice. And the question arises: The thesis statement is too general The first paragraph against the death penalty needs further development; it is not enough to just give an example. In the second one you should have given the statistics you refer to.
You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. This entry was posted in Uncategorized. One Response to Death Penalty:
The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
Custom Against the Death Penalty Essay Writing Service || Against the Death Penalty Essay samples, help There are a number of issues that are considered controversial in our modern society. Some of these issues are death penalty, abortion and euthanasia.
Debate against death penalty essaysThe death penalty has always been a very controversial issue. Death sentences are usually handed out to people who have been found guilty of capital crime. However it is not so easy to consider death penalty as an easy way to punish the guilty. Against The Death Penalty Essay Words | 4 Pages. Against the Death Penalty “Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder.
(Religious Organizing Against the Death Penalty Website) The main argument that advocates for the death penalty have is that the death penalty deters crime, that the threat of execution is enough to make criminals think twice about committing a capital crime. /5(10). Mar 25, · in your essay you have provided some arguments for and against the death penalty but as you can see from my comments below, they need further development/support. The thesis statement is too general The first paragraph against the death penalty needs further development; it is not enough to just give an example.